I revised this post to tone down my anger. I was so pissed when I wrote it I think I damaged my return key. I know, stupid hurts…stop keyboard abuse!
Moral Hazards exist when one party enters into a contract unwittingly and gets taken advantage of by another party. It also occurs when only one party is aware of the benefits of a contract and is in a position to capitalize on another’s ignorance or demise. In insurance, I wasn’t allowed to write a husband a life insurance policy without his knowledge. In the context of business, I could not write a “Key Person” life insurance policy without their consent. The reasons are obvious. Wife standing over her husband with a heart attack, wanting to dial 911…but, can’t decide between Jamaica or Fiji for her insurance money trip.
Marriage is that contract. When only one party benefits under the contract, it’s a violation of ethics. It’s argued that both benefit from marriage, experience says otherwise. But when one person is rewarded for breaking the contract, well, we’re in a whole new world of evil. When breaking a contract is so tempting that you would hurt your kids to benefit yourself, a normal person would wonder what the hell is happening and how to fix it. It was being ignored…and now it is being actively suppressed. You don’t suppress something that isn’t threatening you. And now our words have become a “threat.”
Under any other circumstance, a lawyer would laugh at you if you brought in a contract with the moral hazards of a marriage contract. He would first tell you that you’re making yourself accountable to a state that makes a habit of putting morons like you on the street for little to no reason. He’d probably show you with graphs, pictures and crayon drawings of prisons because he’d assume you must be child-like to even consider getting married. Then your lawyer would ask if you were drinking because you’d have to be in order to give another person control over your children, your income, your property and your liberty; including your first amendment liberty. Without the right to free speech, no other rights matter. Game over.
Enter the SPLC.
Their first salvo in support of the feminist’s version of the black mailer’s charter is “The List.” It’s always the first step. It’s always the “list.” It hasn’t changed in hundreds of years. “The List” is what totalitarians go to when the propaganda starts breaking down, and the propaganda always breaks down. Eventually.
The freedom to the property of thought and speech allows the humblest and poorest to fight the most arrogant and powerful. I know. It blows my mind. The only thing more dangerous than individual liberty is free speech. And free speech is the only true piece of individual property a person has. My opinion.
If I didn’t have kids, I honestly doubt I’d even bother. I’d be gone. But every morning I wake up and I see my kids with a target on their backs. Dramatic? Maybe. I see the Grinning Gutter Saints in suits waiting. Waiting to whisper the glories of slavery in their ear. I can’t let that happen. Not without a fight. Not without warning them. Maybe they won’t listen to me. Maybe, they listen to a friend who heard it from someone who heard it from one of you. Maybe. Years from now, when the fight is being won. When moral hazards aren’t defended as a right. As moral imperative.
It’s not about the SPLC. They have a thousand different faces and a million different names and they will never stop attacking. They were here centuries ago and they’ll be here when the sun goes out. This fight will never end until good men quit fighting. Then? They win.
My kids know the power of words. They know how important they are and how powerful they are. I hope. Anyway, I’m teaching them to fight with words that "lists" can't stop.
Words. Against moral hazards, unjust contracts and debtor’s prison. Even a lawyer can understand that.
And if the SPLC thinks they can stop words, they suffer from a poverty that law degrees can’t help.
I assume this is about the MRM hit list the socialist people's law commisarat put out.
SLPC is a communist front that operates for the communist party (Democratic Party) to silence or intimidate individuals that do not along with their party line. I will personally fight these Communists until the day I die. I am so sick and tired of their retarded rhetoric that goes against logic. The communists want to control every aspect of your life. Feminism is nothing more than a hate movement backed by the communist party to destroy the family unit. Women have made a deal with the devil and will reap what they sow.
Well done Vic, world class writing.
"These elite males - the alpha dogs of the planet - have recruited the bulk of the female population to assist in putting the screws on the bulk of the male population. Effectively creating a 'divide and rule' police state. The generality of women are getting enough perks from the state (to say nothing of all the cultural ego-stroking!) that they aren't about to question the hand that feeds them. Plus, they don't really know what's going on anyway - any more than most men do!"
The Counter-Feminist: CF is More Predictive than Prescriptive
Vic, it's good to vent, bro. Let the steam come right out. That's why fraternities such as MGTOW exist. You know that there are ears listening to you. I feel for people who have gone through pain and hardships.
We are living through very difficult times. There are financial interests that will not hesitate to destroy many people's lives in order to make a profit. Much of today's misery stems fom that, unfortunately.
You wrote: "This fight will never end until good men quit fighting. Then? They win."
It won't happen, bro. Let's honor Churchill's memory and say, together: "We shall never surrender" NEVER!
We shall prevail! Hang on, bro. Don't let go.
"Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. (1941) "
That was back in 1941. I was one year old.
Now there's more to say: If you enemy wins, it is NOT because he won but because you have surrendered. NOBODY can ever win over you unless you give up the fight.
So, it's not the "winner" who wins: it's the loser who lost by giving up.
With that firmly in mind, please realize that we are invincible!
Update: ABC Shamelessly Boosts Leftist Group's Report on 'Extremists'; Hypes Violence Threat
Read more: ABC Shamelessly Boosts Leftist Group's Report on 'Extremists'; Hypes Violence Threat | NewsBusters.org